Marzo 04, 2004

Gallery vs Coppermine

Have been looking at Gallery and was about to install it when I noticed this software [Coppermine]. Has anyone used it? If so how does it compare to gallery?

Posted by munin at Marzo 4, 2004 07:40 AM
Comments

My friend uses coppermine, and I like the way it looks (and the features) much better than gallery. My concern - I've got gallery already, and I don't want to have to reupload all the photos all over again.

If you do install it, give us a shout and let us know how it went? It just looks a lot better than gallery.

Posted by: erika on Marzo 4, 2004 07:51 AM

definitely! am still at a toss up, but maybe am thinking of trying them both just to see what the differences are. just hoping i don't mess things up server wise if we do. :o]

Posted by: munin on Marzo 4, 2004 09:11 PM

greg had looked at using coppermine for my photos after having trouble with gallery. to me it looks similar to pbase....but doesn't have the sleeker look that gallery gives you. i like gallery.

Posted by: Da Goddess on Marzo 7, 2004 03:04 PM

by the way, now that i have thought about it, there were problems with the install of coppermine....

Posted by: Da Goddess on Marzo 9, 2004 06:39 AM

do you remember what the problem was dear?

i've looked at coppermine, but what i really need to find is a forum that discusses photojournal software. got any ideas?

Posted by: munin on Marzo 9, 2004 06:12 PM

keep in mind that coppermine seems to require mysql, which may or may not be good for you

Posted by: david on Enero 22, 2005 08:24 PM
Post a comment